9 Reference

  • Alasuutari, P., Rautalin, M., in Tyrkkö, J. (2018). The Rise of the Idea of Model in Policymaking: The case of the British parliament, 1803-2005. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 59(3), 341–363.
  • Antić Gaber, M., in Ilonszki, G. (2003). Women in parliamentary politics: Hungarian and Slovene cases comparur. Peace Institute, Institute for Contemporary Social and Political Studies.
  • Antić Gaber, M. in Selišnik, I. (2017). The Slovene version of a “fast track” to political equality. Teorija in Praksa, 54(2), 337.
  • Bäck, Hanna., Debus, Marc., in Müller, Jochen. (2014). Who Takes the Parliamentary Floor? The Role of Gender in Speech-making in the Swedish Riksdag.
  • Baker, P. (2014). Using corpora to analyze gender. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Biber, D., in Reppen, R. (2015). The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Biel, Ł., Biernacka, A., in Jopek-Bosiacka, A. (2018). Collocations of Terms in EU Competition Law: A Corpus Analysis of EU English Collocations. V: Language and Law (str. 249–274). Cham: Springer.
  • Bing, J. M., in Bergvall, V. L. (1998). The question of questions: Beyond binary thinking. In J. Coates (ur.), Language and Gender: A Reader (Vol. 1, str. 496–510). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Blaxill, L., in Beelen, K. (2016). Women in Parliament Since 1945: Have they changed the debate? History in Policy.
  • Coates, Jennifer. (1997). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language. London: Longman.
  • Demmen, J., Jeffries, L., in Walker, B. (2018). Charting the semantics of labour relations in House of Commons debates spanning two hundred years. Doing Politics: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse, 80, 81.
  • Eckert, P., in McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goddard, A., in Patterson, L. M. (2015). Language and gender. London: Routledge.
  • Hansen, D. H., Navarretta, C., in Offersgaard, L. (2018). A Pilot Gender Study of the Danish Parliament Corpus. Proceedings of the ParlaClarin Workshop at the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation: (LREC 2018).
  • Ilie, C. (2013). Gendering confrontational rhetoric: Discursive disorder in the British and Swedish parliaments. Democratization, 20(3), 501–521.
  • Ilie, C. (2017). Parliamentary debates. In R. Wodak & B. Forchtner (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and politics (pp. 309–325). Routledge.
  • Jaworska, S., in Ryan, K. (2018). Gender and the language of pain in chronic and terminal illness: A corpus-based discourse analysis of patients’ narratives. Social Science & Medicine, 215, 107–114.
  • Karan, M., Šnajder, J., Sirinic, D., in Glavaš, G. (2016). Analysis of policy agendas: Lessons learned from automatic topic classification of croatian political texts. Proceedings of the 10th SIGHUM Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities, 12–21.
  • Kustec, L. S. (ur.) (2017). Poslanke Državnega zbora: Uradno in osebno od prvega do sedmega mandata (1992-2017). Ljubljana: Državni zbor.
  • Leijenaar, M. (1997). How to create a gender balance in political decision-making: A guide to implementing policies for increasing the participation of women in political decision-making. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Litosseliti, L. (2006). Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. Hodder Arnold.
  • Marshall, C. (2000). Policy discourse analysis: Negotiating gender equity. Journal of Education Policy, 15(2), 125–156.
  • McEnery, T., in Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mensah, E. O., in Wood, S. F. (2018). Articulations of feminine voices in Ghana’s parliament: A study of the Hansard from 2010-2011. AFRREV LALIGENS: An International Journal of Language, Literature and Gender Studies, 7(2), 61–77.
  • Mollin, S. (2007). The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora, 2(2), 187–210.
  • Nanni, F., Osman, M., Cheng, Y.-R., Ponzetto, S. P., in Dietz, L. (2018). UKParl: A Semantified and Topically Organized Corpus of Political Speeches. V: D. Fišer in F. de Jong (ur.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018) (str. 29–32). European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
  • Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handelman, L. D., in Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45(3), 211–236.
  • Osborn, T. L. (2012). How women represent women: Political parties, gender and representation in the state legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pančur, A., Erjavec, T., Ojsteršek, M., Šorn, M., in Blaj Hribar, N. (2020). Slovenian parliamentary corpus (1990-2018) siParl 2.0. Slovenian language resource repository CLARIN.SI.
  • Poynton, C. (1989). Language and gender: Making the difference. Oxford University Press.
  • Rix, K. (2014). ‘Whatever Passed in Parliament Ought to be Communicated to the Public’: Reporting the Proceedings of the Reformed C ommons, 1833–50. Parliamentary History, 33(3), 453–474.
  • Wängnerud, L. (1996). Intressen kontra stereotyper. Varför finns det kvinnliga och manliga politikområden i riksdagen? Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 99(2).
  • Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15, 203–225.
  • Wolbrecht, C. (2002). Female legislators and the women’s rights agenda: From feminine mystique to feminist era. 170–197.